Can Trump Just Pause Federal Funds Like This? | Crooked Media
Support Our Mission: Subscribe to Friends of the Pod Support Our Mission: Subscribe to Friends of the Pod
January 28, 2025
What A Day
Can Trump Just Pause Federal Funds Like This?

In This Episode

  • A federal judge late Tuesday paused a sweeping order from the Trump administration to temporarily freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans. It was welcome news amid a day of total chaos that left everyone from lawmakers to hospital administrators to preschool teachers scrambling to figure out what the hell the administration’s Monday night directive meant for them. White House officials spent the day insisting the funding pause was legal, even as they were forced to clarify its scope throughout the day. Casey Burgat, director of the Legislative Affairs program at George Washington University’s Graduate School of Political Management, explains why the administration faces an uphill legal battle defending it’s order.
  • And in headlines: Newly confirmed Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem wants everyone to know she’s a ‘Hot Mama,’ the Trump administration offers deferred resignation to government employees, and President Donald Trump signed another executive order targeting trans people.
Show Notes:

Follow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

Jane Coaston: It’s Wednesday, January 29th. I’m Jane Coaston. And this is What a Day, the show staring at the new axios poll saying that republicans now trust trump as much as their own doctor when it comes to making personal health decisions. So we can assume their doctors are not very good at doctoring. [music break] On today’s show, newly confirmed Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem wants everyone to know she’s a hot mama. And President Donald Trump signs another executive order targeting trans people. But first, Tuesday afternoon, a federal judge paused a sweeping order from the Trump administration to temporarily freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans. It was welcome news after a day where the nation devolved into abject chaos as everyone from lawmakers to hospital administrators to preschool teachers tried to figure out what in the hell the administration meant with its Monday night order. Medicaid reimbursement portals went down in every state. It jeopardized federal payments to state health care programs that cover treatments for millions of low income Americans. The same thing happened with Head Start, the federal Early Childhood education Program for low income kids. Providers said they lost access to the federal government’s payment website, potentially upending things like payroll. Nonprofits, universities, medical research centers, housing assistance programs, all were left scrambling in the wake of the funding freeze. The mess and panic finally gave Democrats something resembling a spine to forcefully stand up to Trump. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker said the administration’s actions were illegal. 

 

[clip of Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker] Donald Trump’s administration is lying to you. The White House’s attempt to walk back what they did today does not match what we saw on the ground. 

 

Jane Coaston: More than 20 state attorneys general have sued. So have some businesses and nonprofits. But all the while, the White House defended the funding freezes like no big deal, even as it spent the day trying to clarify the scope of the order. In her first press briefing, White House Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that unilaterally pausing funds appropriated by Congress and that were signed into law is all very legal. 

 

[clip of Karoline Leavitt] This is certainly within the confines of the law. So White House counsel’s office believes that this is within the president’s power to do it, and therefore, he’s doing it. 

 

Jane Coaston: Oh they believe that, do they? Guys it’s only been like a week and this shit is straight up bonkers. The original memo sent out Monday said this was about rooting out, quote, “Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green New Deal social engineering policies.” Sure. But to try and make a little sense out of it, I spoke to Casey Burgat. He’s the director of the legislative affairs program at George Washington University’s Graduate School of Political Management, and he hosts GW’s political podcast, Mastering the Room. Casey, welcome back to What a Day. 

 

Casey Burgat: Thank you. Thank you. 

 

Jane Coaston: So can the President just do this like it’s been a while since I took civics, but I was pretty sure Congress controlled the purse strings. 

 

Casey Burgat: Yeah, this is the fundamental question, right? And no. I mean, constitutionally, they can’t. Um. But there are a lot of things that are written in the Constitution that ultimately come down to people checking that power. Right. We say we live in a system of checks and balances, but they don’t exist automatically where the the president overreaches and all of a sudden some buzzer sounds and he can’t do that anymore. It relies on the courts. It relies on, especially Congress, to protect their constitutional powers. And the power of the purse is at the top of that list that they need to protect. 

 

Jane Coaston: At this point. And we’re talking on Tuesday afternoon. The legal sticking point over Trump’s OMB order seems to be whether it’s temporary. That Trump may be within his legal right to pause federal funding for a short amount of time, but not long term. He can’t just cancel it. Is that correct? 

 

Casey Burgat: That’s my understanding of it, that the cancellation I mean, the power of the purse. We had uh Nixon in the ’70s impound funds, which is just deciding not to spend money on something that Congress said that the president should. And Congress wrote a law in response to that impoundment saying that you can’t do that. It is explicitly in statute that you can’t impound money. So the length of time, yes, that may be a sticking point. At some point, though, this is going to come down to individual judges deciding individual cases. And that’s just bad as these programs are supposed to carry out, these affect everyday people in the interim. And that’s that’s a tough position for them to be in. 

 

Jane Coaston: Let’s back up for a second, though. How does this grant money get appropriated in the first place? 

 

Casey Burgat: It’s a long, long, long process within Congress. This is what we see them fighting over every single shutdown deadline uh where Congress goes back and forth and decides what amount to spend, on what purposes. And most of times they’re really specific. And these programs get this money for this long and it comes through appropriations bills, which are signed into law not only by members of Congress, but also the president of the United States, and their laws of how money should be spent. This is the definition, the undergirding of the power of the purse that you’ve heard about since you were about seven years old. 

 

Jane Coaston: So this is basically Trump taking away Congress’s job. And it’s been weird to me, and I’m curious to see what you think. A lot of Republicans in Congress seem mostly okay with this. 

 

Casey Burgat: It’s not only taking away Congress’s job, it’s taking away Congress’s decisions they have already made. Right. Like these are appropriations bills that have been debated, negotiated, passed. This money has been appropriated. The law has been signed. And now they are reinterpreting it and changing it through executive action. And so this will require congressional response. If they don’t want this to go through. They should protect the constitutional power of the purse, and knowing that there’s Republican majorities in both chambers, that means congressional Republicans. And this is where I get most scared, is that we see statements from the current chairman of the Appropriations Committee, the guy who’s actually in charge of writing these bills, saying, yeah, this is all normal. This isn’t he even called these not laws. Make no mistake, they have been passed by both chambers. They’ve been signed by the president the same way every single law has been. So this reinterpretation is taking advantage of of people not really, I guess, knowing how the sausage is actually made. But they know better. They know better. And these are the last people that should be giving up this power because they’re the ones that can use it um to to their own ends within Congress. It’s just full capitulation at its worst. And I would be saying that if it were a Democrat on a Democrat too. 

 

Jane Coaston: Now the White House says the freeze is meant to weed out spending on things like DEI or gender stuff they don’t like, or the Green New Deal, which is not a law that exists, but it’s all shorthand for programs that conflict with Trump’s policy priorities. It does not seem like it would be that easy to single out funding for these programs. Is it? Like we’re talking about trillions of dollars of spending here. 

 

Casey Burgat: Correct. No. I mean, this is going into a huge field with a fine tooth comb and saying, I want to pick this and not that. And there are ways that you can do that, but this ain’t the way to do it. This ain’t it. This is like break everything and then we’ll put it back together in the way that we want. And that is just the ultimate degree of abstractionist governing where you’re not thinking about programs and people. This is Elon has his has his hands written all over this. 

 

Jane Coaston: Exactly. 

 

Casey Burgat: Right? 

 

Jane Coaston: That’s what I was just thinking. 

 

Casey Burgat: Yeah. If this is a the Ellen way of doing it that we will break it and then build it in our own mold. But man, the government doesn’t work like that. That is just a really reductive and harmful way to to make any budget cuts or budgetary changes. 

 

Jane Coaston: You mentioned President Richard Nixon and the Impoundment Control Act, which is supposed to prevent the president from doing all of this. But Trump and his pick to run the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, have argued that’s unconstitutional. What is their argument? 

 

Casey Burgat: That the president, as the executor of the executive branch, the leader of the executive branch, can have some role to play, that Congress can’t dictate how the administration of the laws actually are carried out. So Congress writes the laws. They fund the laws. It’s up to the president to actually administer them. But, man, that is a really a that’s a theory that’s going to get challenged. That is a theory without a ton of support. The Constitution is is there and pretty unequivocal that the Congress has the power of the purse and that the funds, the administration of those laws, including appropriations laws, should be carried out according to what’s called legislative intent, Congress’s will. 

 

Jane Coaston: Already there’s talk of this issue ending up before the Supreme Court because–

 

Casey Burgat: Yeah. 

 

Jane Coaston: –we haven’t had more fun. 

 

Casey Burgat: Yeah. 

 

Jane Coaston: Or we haven’t had enough fun. 

 

Casey Burgat: Let’s go back. 

 

Jane Coaston: Yeah, I think that would be great. I think what we all want is for the Supreme Court to decide literally everything we do for the rest of our lives. 

 

Casey Burgat: Yeah. 

 

Jane Coaston: And this court has been very deferential to the scope of the president’s executive authority. I mean, not even a year ago, the justices said that presidents are immune from prosecution for official acts. So should the court take this up? How do you see this playing out? 

 

Casey Burgat: I don’t know. These are one of the things. You wake up in the morning and you say, what are we talking about anymore? Like, what are we doing here? These are things that we’ve already debated. We literally passed a law 50 years ago to decide exactly this. And now, just like Roe v Wade, even if you think it’s settled, a couple of generations later, you’re having the same fights over and over. And it’s really frustrating for a lot of folks who who there’s a lot of good that we can do or a lot of things that we need to do, and we shouldn’t be litigating this type of stuff. There are ways to do this constitutionally and legally. This ain’t that. 

 

Jane Coaston: Now, executive orders aren’t a new thing. Like I’m old enough to remember when people got mad at the Obama administration for for ruling with, quote, a, you know, “a pen and a phone.” Obama and Biden used them a lot to get things done. And it just feels like in the sheer scope of Trump’s orders and the speed and the parts of the federal government that are being targeted, a lot of people’s lives are being upended by these executive orders, executive orders that seem, as you mentioned, just based on breaking things and figuring it out later. And this kind of unilateral action feels pretty antithetical to the founding principles of our democracy. So as someone who studies government, how are you thinking about this moment? 

 

Casey Burgat: I don’t like it. [laughter] Right. Like this is just you can even love and I say this to a lot of my my friends on the other side who are like, you can love what he’s doing, but the process often matters more. And so what you’re effectively saying is you’re signing up for someone who you fundamentally disagreeing with doing this back to you on things you disagree with, and they will go farther. That’s what we know about presidential power graphs. It’s always going to get more and more unless they are just absolutely checked by the constitutional players of the game, namely Congress and the courts. 

 

Jane Coaston: Casey, thank you so much for joining us. 

 

Casey Burgat: Any time. 

 

Jane Coaston: That was my conversation with Casey Burgat, director of the legislative affairs program at GW’s Graduate School of Political Management. We’ll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe. Leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts. Watch us on YouTube and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. [music break]

 

[AD BREAK]

 

Jane Coaston: Here’s what else we’re following today. 

 

[sung] Headlines. 

 

[clip of Kristi Noem] Your mission is big and it’s vast. And I know that you approach it with a seriousness of which the day and age that we live in requires. 

 

Jane Coaston: Newly sworn in department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem addressed her new staff Tuesday afternoon. Her serious approach included walking on to Trace Adkins song Hot Mama, which features this also very serious lyric. [clears throat in a fake way] Getting them old jeans, you want that body back you had at 17. Baby, don’t get down. Don’t you worry about a thing. Because the way you fill them out. Hey, that’s all right with me. [sigh] Earlier in the day, she donned an ICE vest to join federal agents in New York City for an immigration enforcement operation. 

 

[clip of Kristi Noem] Here in New York City this morning, we are getting the dirt bags off these streets. 

 

[clip of Kristi Noem] Noem posted on Twitter, quote, “We are doing this thing right, doing exactly what President Donald Trump promised the American people, making our streets safe.” A raid in the Bronx resulted in arrests of immigrants, including a man accused of kidnapping. Authorities said the man was also one of several alleged Venezuelan gang members caught on video last year taking over an apartment building in Aurora, Colorado. New York City Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul, both Democrats, backed the immigration operation in the country’s largest sanctuary city. Adams said the city, quote, “will not hesitate to partner with federal authorities to bring violent criminals to justice, just as we have done for years.” Over in Chicago, the response to federal law enforcement operations was quite different. Mayor Brandon Johnson said at a news conference Tuesday, quote, “This desire to popularize fear is unconscionable and abhorrent.” 

 

[clip of Brandon Johnson] We stand together firmly in our welcoming city status, as well as our commitment to protecting all residents of the city of Chicago. No matter where you come from or how long you’ve lived here. 

 

Jane Coaston: ICE hasn’t offered much information about the operation in Chicago. Officials there estimate roughly 100 people were taken into custody. The Trump administration is offering deferred resignations to any government employee who doesn’t want to return to the office. The email sent to federal workers says, quote, “If you choose to remain in your current position, we thank you for your renewed focus on serving the American people. For folks who decide to leave, the email promises, you will be provided with a dignified, fair departure.” Sure. One section of the email lays out the Trump administration’s standards of conduct, which calls for employees to be loyal and trustworthy. Those who engage in misconduct could be investigated and disciplined. President Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday that would cut federal funding for gender affirming care for trans youth. This basically means that Medicaid and other federally backed insurance companies can no longer cover transition related treatments like hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender affirming surgeries. The rule would apply to anyone under the age of 19 seeking gender affirming care. So not just trans kids, adults too. America, the country where you can be old enough to vote and die in a war but too young to make decisions about your own fucking body. Trump put out a statement on Tuesday deeming these treatments, quote, “destructive and life altering.” Even though they’re endorsed as perfectly safe by every single major medical organization. This is just the latest attack on trans rights by the Trump administration. On Monday, Trump signed an executive order to ban trans folks from serving in the military. On his first day in office, he signed another that limits the definition of sex to male or female. 

 

[clip of Senator Gary Peters] After three terms in the House and two terms in the Senate. I believe now is time for me to write a few more paragraphs in my current chapter and then turn over the reigns. I will therefore not seek reelection in 2026. 

 

Jane Coaston: On Tuesday, Michigan Democratic Senator Gary Peters announced he won’t pursue a third term in the Senate. 

 

[clip of Senator Gary Peters] Although I will not be on the ballot next year. I will not just walk away. I plan to actively campaign to ensure we elect a dynamic Democratic candidate to be the next U.S. senator from Michigan. 

 

Jane Coaston: His surprise announcement leaves Democrats in Michigan to defend a critical Senate seat without the advantage of an incumbent. Those reportedly interested in the seat include former Biden transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg.

 

[clip of Karoline Leavitt] From President Trump directly, an update on the New Jersey drones. After research and study, the drones that were flying over New Jersey in large numbers were authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons.

 

Jane Coaston: In a how should we put this, wide ranging press conference on Tuesday, newly minted White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Americans have nothing to fear. The New Jersey drones weren’t here to harm us. 

 

[clip of Karoline Leavitt] This was not the enemy. 

 

Jane Coaston: President Trump has been fixated on these drones for quite some time. Remember last December, Trump suggested the Biden administration knew more about the situation than it was sharing in his typical fear mongering, chum throwing away. 

 

[clip of President Donald Trump] The government knows what is happening. Uh. Look, our military knows where they took off from. If it’s a garage, they can go right into that garage. They know where it came from and where it went. And for some reason, they don’t want to comment. 

 

Jane Coaston: Then White House National Security communications adviser John Kirby said they were lawful and legal aviation activities. Here’s what he said on the Today Show. 

 

[clip of John Kirby] We know that there’s no national security threat. We know there’s no public safety threat. 

 

Jane Coaston: So apparently Trump needed to redo the Biden administration’s work to let the public know again that the drones in New Jersey didn’t pose a threat. And now that Trump’s president, I don’t know about you, but this sounds like the type of government redundancy Elon Musk and DOGE are supposed to clean up. And that’s the news. [music break] One more thing, today starts the confirmation hearings for Robert F. Kennedy Junior for secretary of Health and Human Services. He has a lot of support from across the political spectrum, from people genuinely worried about plastics in our food supply to Instagram grifters trying to scare people about the dangers dihydrogen monoxide poses to kids. That’s water folks. Water. But he’s got some major opposition. From his cousin, Caroline Kennedy, former U.S. ambassador to Australia. 

 

[clip of Caroline Kennedy] I’ve known Bobby my whole life. We grew up together. It’s no surprise that he keeps birds of prey as pets because Bobby himself is a predator. 

 

Jane Coaston: And particularly from conservatives. The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued that he’s a danger to public health writing, quote, “Senators would be wise to believe RFK Jr’s career of spreading falsehoods rather than his confirmation conversions.” And the New York Post editorial board, which has never met a Democrat it didn’t hate, quoted Trump himself when he said in April 2024 that RFK Jr is a radical left lunatic before adding, quote, “We sincerely believe Trump would live to regret a Secretary Kennedy, we know the United States would.” Now, I’ve seen some people argue online that all of this criticism from Republicans is a good thing because obviously Republicans like bad things and hate good things. Ergo, RFK Jr must be good. He hates oil companies. He believes in climate change. He wants to get pollutants out of our water. But this is oppositional defiance disorder masquerading as politics. And the fact that Trump nominated him in the first place should tell us something. Because, yes, actually, RFK Jr is absolutely bananas like beyond typical anti-vaxxer level bananas, which is a level of bananas I really didn’t think I need to worry about in my actual life. In 2021, he said during an appearance for his group Children’s Health Defense, quote, “now we know that, you know, we should not be giving Black people the same vaccine schedule that’s given to whites because their immune system is better than ours.” Which is huge fucking news to me. A Black person. Back when he was running for president in 2023, he told the New York Post, quote, “Covid 19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.” It wasn’t and they weren’t. But like I said, bananas. Now, you could believe that Donald Trump has brought RFK Jr in to be part of a team of rivals where RFK Jr could speak truth to power and get microplastics out of our kids cereals or something. Or you could remember that last week the Trump administration reversed plans to stop so-called forever chemicals, which have been linked to terrible health effects from being discharged into wastewater. And you could remember that during Trump’s first term, people who challenged him tended not to last long in his administration. Because the problem with RFK Jr isn’t just that he’s completely bananas and would run roughshod over public health in this country. It’s that he’d be working with an administration that would ensure that any good, any actual good thing he wanted to do was impossible. [music break]

 

[AD BREAK]

 

Jane Coaston: That’s all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe. Leave a review. Send your favorite federal employee a care package and tell your friends to listen. And if you’re into reading and not just about how demonizing working for the federal government and trying to strip such employees of their rights just guarantees shitty government like me, What a Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at Crooked.com/subscribe. I’m Jane Coaston. And breaking stuff is not governance. [music break] What a Day is a production of Crooked Media. It’s recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producers are Raven Yamamoto and Emily Fohr. Our producer is Michell Eloy. We had production help today from Johanna Case, Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters and Julia Clare. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison and our executive producer is Adriene Hill. Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East. 

 

[AD BREAK]